Monday, April 22, 2013

Mean and Yang

In Tara's essay, we see that she mentions the fact that she fell for the "bad boy" figure, which alienated her from her friends and family. I was curious to see if this was a trend... of good girls falling for bad guys and vice versa, and I found an interesting list of movies where this happens. Is it possible that polarized views on responsibilities lead to great interpersonal chemistry? Are such people simply attracted to each other or is their ultimate relationship doomed for failure or success from the start?

Monday, April 15, 2013

A Response to Kevin

I saw Kevin's post as a thematic as well as a structural collage. I mean this in the way that he seemed to convey a very whimsical personality, as collages often portray. Although he may take action on whims, he was in no way erratic, as I noticed him taking on activities of physical or athletic nature. I could tell he was, and very well may still be, a very energetic and active person who does not mind exploring his interests. In a class where our interests are prodded and our identities inspected, I would enjoy reading more of the essays he has written thus far.

All I can hope for is that you be careful and not try anything that would alter you permanently, as is the case of this person.



A response to Sarah

When reading Sarah's essay, I could not help but notice the common underlying theme of social outliers. Although I have not read the book Outliers myself, I believe it treats this topic very well. Although my father told me many improbable stories talking about the ability to be a virtuoso instrumentalist, it was another book (that I did, in fact, read) which treats the effect on society and on the individual when said individual is an outlier and renounces conformity. This book is called The Selfish Gene and it speaks about the benefits of rejecting the social norm. Although according to the book, such advantageous activity is beneficial to the individual, the group as a whole is somehow hurt. In this way, Game theory is briefly mentioned. I urge Sarah and anyone else interested in evolutionary psychology (if ever there was such a term) to read Richard Dawkin's piece.